Benjy Grogan wrote:
Isn't Red Hat forking the accelerated GL community by working on AIGLX instead of Xgl?
No. Aside from that though, Xgl benefits from the work being done on aiglx.
It seems like Xgl is to AIGLX as SELinux is to AppArmor.
That would be a giant misconception on your part.
It would be great if Red Hat and Novell could convene under a big tent and agree to work on SELinux for security and Xgl for accelereated GL.
You don't seem to understand the problem domain very well. Might be worth educating yourself on exactly what Xgl is, and exactly what accelerated indirect rendering is before formulating grossly ignorant opinions. -- Mike A. Harris * Open Source Advocate * http://mharris.ca Proud Canadian. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
