Re: aiglx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 13:26 -0500, Benjy Grogan wrote:
> Isn't Red Hat forking the accelerated GL community by working on AIGLX
> instead of Xgl?  It seems like Xgl is to AIGLX as SELinux is to
> AppArmor.

AFAIK the one "forking" things was Suse/Novel, because they did their
work in secret. 

> It would be great if Red Hat and Novell could convene under a big tent
> and agree to work on SELinux for security and Xgl for accelereated
> GL. 

Yeah and all VI users should use Emacs, all Evolution users Thunderbird,
all Firefox users Mozilla  and all KDE users should use Gnome. 

But I agree with you that everybody that works on software that I don't
use is wasting his time, and that they work on the wrong software also
is the cause I have to wait longer on the software I want to use.

- Erwin

PS: The person who finds sarcasm in this mail, is allowed to keep it ;-)


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux