> Josh Boyer wrote: > >>>>I agree that kernels in extras is not a good idea. However, you have >>>>the >>>>same security issues with kernel _modules_ in extras. Think OpenAFS >>>>security issue, etc. >>>> >>>> >>>OpenAFS can't go in extras, the license isn't compatible with the GPL >>>(and thus the kernel license) >>> >>> >> >>I'm not going to bite on that, sorry :). All I know is that there are >>some packaging OpenAFS at the moment with the intention of getting it >> into >>Extras. >> >> > The guidelines allow that. From > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines Yes I know. I believe Arjan was making a tounge-in-cheek reference to the old "derivative work" issue associated with kernel modules in general. If that's not the case, then I misunderstood. If it is the case, I still won't bite ;). That doesn't necessarily mean I disagree either. I'd rather just avoid another flame w^H^H^H^H^H^H^H discussion about that subject right now. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
