> >> I agree that kernels in extras is not a good idea. However, you have >> the >> same security issues with kernel _modules_ in extras. Think OpenAFS >> security issue, etc. > > OpenAFS can't go in extras, the license isn't compatible with the GPL > (and thus the kernel license) I'm not going to bite on that, sorry :). All I know is that there are some packaging OpenAFS at the moment with the intention of getting it into Extras. > > > yes extras has SOME security issues. But it's not the same. There is a > difference between having to fix a roothole in 15 different kernels and > building 15 modules, and having to fix it in one, and then potentially > rebuild a few outside modules. Just in build time alone, but also in > complexity and testing. Yes, DaveJ already pointed that out. I stand corrected, sorta :). josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
