On Mon, 2006-01-02 at 14:51 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote: > On 1/2/06, Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-01-01 at 15:05 -0800, Michael A. Peters wrote: > > > > > The problem is there are a fair number of packages that are not > > > overlapping but depend upon overlapping. So it really is difficult if > > > you have a sizeable repository like Axel does. > > > > My feeling is that 95% of all those "not overlapping but dependent" > > cases can be avoided with a healthy dose of common sense. Such as, less > > aggressive tracking of new releases, etc. > > If you want less aggressive tracking, don't use 3rd party and/or use > distro that matches this policy (eg. use CentOS instead). I feel a communications breakdown here. I was speaking about less aggressive version tracking in 3rd party repos with Fedora. And "don't use 3rd party" is so bogus I'm not even going to debunk it. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
