So, is there interest to have ATrpms for FC5 less overlapping with core packages? If so, is there any redhat.com folk that would be willing to add versioned obsoletes/provides to core specfiles? That's neccessary to ensure upgradability. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpNHJ1Q1EDxS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
