Re: ATrpms and FC5/RHEL5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/2/06, Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> And "don't use 3rd party" is so bogus I'm not even going to debunk it.

It basically comes down to this, if a 3rd party is not doing something you like:

1. Communicate what's wrong on the 3rd party's mailing list. (Not on fedora's.)
2. Offer specs, patches, mechanisms, or scripts via 3rd party's
mailing list and/or bugtracker.

If that fails to alter the course of the 3rd party repo into a
direction you like, then you have the following choices:

1. Don't use the 3rd party repo.
2. Fork it and create your own.
3. Import packages into a repo that caters to your policies.
4. Rant about it randomly.

Anyway, this is all way off topic.

The conclusion of this thread is:

If there is a 3rd party repo having difficulty integrating with
Core/Extras because of a Versioned Obsoletes problem, then hang a
bugzilla for that specific package. Otherwise, Core/Extras has no
obligation to take on a massive undertaking that would cater to 3rd
party repositories.

That's it.
--
-jeff

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux