Jeff Pitman wrote:
On 12/27/05, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
What exactly is your
solution that you are suggesting?
If Redhat is unwilling to signup to Fluendo's free-of-charge, open
source, but not entirely free software deal, that's understandable. At
least provide explicit instructions on how to get MP3 bootstrapped so
as to attract and retain new users.
This is a potential solution but one that requires careful thought.
Instead of some vague FAQ in the
About page of Fedora. Maybe put in a yum.repos.d config commented out
that would allow easy installation with a disclaimer comment. You
know, user-oriented stuff.
How do you know about the legal implications of this?. Does it suit the
project goals?. Like I said before halting the discussion now and taking
it to the legal team would be the right solution. Be patient before
putting in references to SCO which isnt the same thing at all.
--
Rahul
Learn. Network. Experience open source.
Red Hat Summit Nashville | May 30 - June 2, 2006
Learn more: http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
