On 12/24/05, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This proposal OTOH is pretty much your take it or leave it traditional > closed software offer. I disagree. If it were a traditional closed-source software offer, then the thread would have terminated long ago. What we have here is an offer that allows Fedora to, at the very least, explicitly point users to a friendly way to get MP3 support. Do we monitor the fedora-user list and other fedora forums to ensure that no mention of livna and freshrpms are made? These might constitute as patent violations because the comments are hosted by Redhat and are vehicles for which users can circumvent the patent-less distro. (Optimally, FC should just take up the offer and include it in the distro. Wasn't Redhat offering indemnication against ghost-cases of patent claims during the SCO debacle? How about MP3? :D) -- -jeff -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
