Jeff Pitman wrote:
On 12/27/05, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The risk/reward ratio for Red Hat to consider indemnifying users against
the two issues is completely different. I don't think you'll see Red
Hat going out on a limb for MP3 players.
IOW, indemnification offers are just hot air. But, we know this isn't
indemnification for MP3s, it's a different beast. The comment was to
highlight where Redhat's priorities are. For good or bad.
Let's not forget that the "holier-than-thou" stance alienates quite a few users.
Can you explain that comment a bit more?. Do you mean the stance on
providing only open source software without restrictions?
--
Rahul
Learn. Network. Experience open source.
Red Hat Summit Nashville | May 30 - June 2, 2006
Learn more: http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
