Hi
Do you mean the stance on providing only open source software without restrictions?
Yes. And that's not to say that I disagree with the stance. In fact, I
agree with it given that "restrictions" are well-defined.
Right. The restrictions are pretty well defined at this point. The
project goals are well advertised and active on the lists I believe
knows about it.
Being
belligerent about looking into potential workarounds is not a show of
good faith. And, when you do not show good faith, you lose people.
Maybe you don't care; that's fine. But, it's good to be reminded that
the stances we take can and will alienate a bunch of people. It's the
truth whether you "much rather change the world instead of going along
with it" or not.
--
How is a Free and open source stance not showing good faith? . There
are over seventy distributions based on Fedora. Its not religion or
whims. Yes it will alienate a few proprietary software supporters who
will have to get the software from elsewhere. What exactly is your
solution that you are suggesting?. Vague notions dont help resolve
anything.
--
Rahul
Learn. Network. Experience open source.
Red Hat Summit Nashville | May 30 - June 2, 2006
Learn more: http://www.redhat.com/promo/summit/
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
