> But I have to wonder...for yumdownloader and repoquery to work > efficiently it still helps to pull in metadata about the srpm repos > during yum runs. Out-of-date srpm information isn't particularly > useful. why? That's like saying - in order to work efficiently it's best if firefox cache every page you've ever been to and all of those pages you've NOT been to, too. > If the magical mirrorlist and metadata caching makes it into the > default yum configuration...how expensive does retrieving the srpm > metadata become? a little less than double the amount of data. > At the very least I would certaintly want yum makecache to cache all > the enabled repos including enabled srpm information. If a source repo is not enabled then it's not enabled. The only thing marking them as source would do is tell yumdownloader which repos to enable if someone passed --source to it. > I personally don't think its worth trying to turn the srpm parsing > off. Once I enable srpm repos, I benefit more by having the srpm > information cached locally in a state that matches the rpm > information. What I'm more concerned about is seeing the srpm > information and the binary information come from different mirrors > which are out of sync with each other. you're really not understanding what I'm talking about. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list