* Konstantin Ryabitsev <icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2005-11-26 11:19]: > On Sat, 2005-26-11 at 10:57 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > [...] you a) can't easily install any of the third-package plugins that > aren't already packaged into RPMs, See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=90630 Tom Tromey already mentioned the library issue that has been fixed. > b) can't update the plugins that come from RPMs Again, see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=90630 . There are many things to consider here and if you have input, it would be great if you could comment on that bug. > so you're stuck with old versions (e.g. a rather dated version of PyDev). We can't include newer version of PyDev because they depend upon 1.5-level stuff that we can't build. Before someone says "use retroweaver", we have to be able to build the code before we can munge the bytecode so if ecj + Classpath (ecj may be 1.5-level compatible but if Classpath is missing something) can't built it to begin with, we can't ship it. > So, unless you write lots of stuff in gcj-java, Eclipse as provided by > Fedora would be of limited use. I don't see how you come to this conclusion. Andrew -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
