On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 20:32 -0800, Kenneth Porter wrote: > This is really the first statement I've seen that looks like a useful > guideline, albeit an indirect one. If Fedora is to be the next RHEL, then > we just need to look at the requirements for RHEL to know how Core and > Extras gets split. Except for the fact that RHEL can include content from Extras. The Fedora -> RHEL used to be a guideline that governs what went into core and what went into extras. Now that RHEL can consist of Extras content, this is no longer a hindrance. In reality, we could move say... KDE to extras, and RHEL will still be able to ship KDE with it's next version. I know i'm not the only one that would like to see KDE in extras, but there are a lot of people that wouldn't. So don't start a thread on this particular subject. Please use the wiki page that Seth set up. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
