On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 10:43 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > B/c of the rapidly evolving nature of the gcj and related java tools, > what if we moved them to extras so that work on those packages could be > both public and move faster? > > It would be a big savings on the size of core and it seems like adding > those packages over there would be the most correct as the java packages > don't really have any necessary reason to be in core. > > What do you think? +1. I'm all in favor of reducing the size of core. Hopefully, someday it can be whittled down to 1 cd. Though, isn't the openoffice.org packages dependent on several of the java tools? /B -- Brian Pepple <bdpepple@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
