Mario Torre wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 2:11 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Mario Torre wrote:
>> > OpenJDK 11 is EOL in Fedora regardless of the Fedora version, it hasn’t
>> > been updated in January for example.
>>
>> This is entirely unacceptable. The package shipped with Fedora 41, so it
>> MUST get security backports until the Fedora 41 EOL. If the maintainers
>> do not want to take care of that, they should orphan the package and let
>> somebody else push the required security updates.
>
> I am afraid not.
>
> If you want an updated package, you should be using the latest
> versions, anything else is a best effort and there's no guarantee it
> will be updated going forward.
Nonsense. OpenJDK 11 is an LTS version that is still getting security
updates upstream and, e.g., in Adoptium Temurin (to which the console spam
from the Fedora RPM was actually pointing). It just takes updating the
Fedora package with the fixed point releases from the LTS branch.
Kevin Kofler
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
