On 2/12/25 10:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 2:11 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mario Torre wrote:
OpenJDK 11 is EOL in Fedora regardless of the Fedora version, it hasn’t
been updated in January for example.
This is entirely unacceptable. The package shipped with Fedora 41, so it
MUST get security backports until the Fedora 41 EOL. If the maintainers
do not want to take care of that, they should orphan the package and let
somebody else push the required security updates.
I am afraid not.
If you want an updated package, you should be using the latest
versions, anything else is a best effort and there's no guarantee it
will be updated going forward.
Nonsense. OpenJDK 11 is an LTS version that is still getting security
I Agree with Kevin, and I keep it updated, as long as I'm alive. As noted elsewhere in this thread, I'm negotiating with jdk11 possible future maintainers they step in as help.
updates upstream and, e.g., in Adoptium Temurin (to which the console spam
from the Fedora RPM was actually pointing). It just takes updating the
Spam? Is that really so bad? What else would you suggest?
Fedora package with the fixed point releases from the LTS branch.
Kevin Kofler
--
Jiri Vanek Mgr.
Principal QA Software Engineer
Red Hat Inc.
+420 775 39 01 09
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
