Re: disappointment over default acpid config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 10:14 -0500, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 11/7/05, Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Oops. Why half-assed?
> 
> because... there are "no user logged-in" situations that never see gdm
> or any dm running.
> If this solution is a script that gdm's default PreSession runs thats
> fine... the point is it can't be tied into the guts of gdm... it needs
> to be a general solution for the no user case. Something
> shellscriptable works as a general solution. Looking around here for
> example... the thinclients at this facility aren't actually running
> gdm in the no login case.

So a small non-gui, shellscriptable version of g-p-m would do the trick?

Can you jump on the g-p-m m/l [1] and I'll see what I can do:

Richard

[1] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gnome-power-devel

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux