Re: disappointment over default acpid config

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-11-07 at 19:54 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Pekka Savola wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Richard Hughes wrote:
> >
> >> I've not had one user of a HTPC wanting to use g-p-m (that I know about)
> >> as it's designed primarily for laptops and PC's.
> >
> >
> > But that's the point.  Are we heading towards a situation where ACPI 
> > power management would only be feasible for those folks which run Gnome?
> 
> g-p-m is obviously intended for GNOME but would work on other desktop 
> enviroments. Underlying framework like hal, dbus etc can be used by any 
> other desktop environment to write their own frontends. a console only 
> policy in plain C is possible too.

Agreed.

Richard.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux