On 29. 11. 24 15:47, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:36:44PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 28. 11. 24 23:49, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 4:30 AM Florian Weimer<fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Richard W. M. Jones:
One question is whether it's better to add this as a sub-package of
qemu, or as a new source package. Using a new source package means we
won't be introducing awkward circular build dependencies, or a
heavyweight build dependency on qemu for non-virt packages. The price
is the overhead of having another source package.
It would also be bureaucratically simpler to just make it a sub-RPM of
'qemu' rather than a standalone qemu-srpm-macros package, but given the
frequency of changes that's not a massive pain, given that virt maintainers
would still own it.
I suppose changes in qemu are significantly more often than chnages in this macro.
When this is a sbpackage of qemu, any change to qemu will unnecessarily cause
and update of the macro pakcage in all the buildroots.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
