On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 12:48 PM Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 9/5/24 12:06 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > > > Do you think that is a technical decision, based e.g. on dependencies > > they need, or a business decision to use the app store? It's their > > right to choose, but I'm curious whether it reflects the broader > > developer sentiment towards flatpaks. > I have no idea. I don’t believe the Fedora package has any technical > defects in practice. In this case, I was willing to follow upstream’s > request without further investigation into their motives, and I’m not > drawing any broader conclusions. In fact, I still maintain Fedora > packages for a few other programs that are distributed in the > ElementaryOS AppCenter but developed by different people. In my experience (as the original Fedora packager of many of these "Made for elementary" apps that are now distributed via the elementary flatpak remote), there's often no technical problems with building them for Fedora. The only "real" issue some of them had is that parts of their UI looked very broken if they weren't used with the elementary GTK theme, especially if they used custom widgets and / or heavily relied on widgets that are part of Granite. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue