On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 8:06 AM Dridi Boukelmoune <dridi.boukelmoune@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 10:21 AM Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Seems like the fedora list moderators decided to not let the follow-ups pass to the fedora-dev list, > > so please if you're interested follow the discussion on one of the other involved mailing lists. > > I'm fairly sure this is also relevant here. > > There are other threads on this mailing list mentioning mailman > problems when cross-posting to multiple lists. > > Probably not a moderator intervention. > > > E.g., see for the thread > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2024-September/159610.html Correct, many of the responses were only being sent to one of the other mailing lists CCed in the original email as well. My recommendation is that the original mailing be treated as a notice for all the distros to start talking, but one SINGLE mailing list be designated for continuing the conversation. The upstream libc-alpha list seems like the best choice to me, as it's distro-agnostic and directly relevant to the changes being proposed. -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
