On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 1:24 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> perl-RPC-XML hobbes1069 jplesnik ppisar > > This one I have no idea what to do with: > License: (Artistic 2.0 or Artistic or LGPLv2) and (Artistic 2.0 or LGPLv2) Just looked at this - it seemed to me that the author had intended to relicense from "Artistic" (not clear whether that referred to Artistic-1.0 or Artistic-1.0-Perl in SPDX parlance) to (again in SPDX parlance) Artistic-2.0 OR LGPL-2.1-only. I.e. I didn't see anything that seemed to obviously be licensed under Artistic-1.0* and the author seemed to (in later statements) use "Artistic License" specifically to mean Artistic-2.0. However, I only took a quick look. :) Richard -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
