On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 11:22 AM Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Dne 30. 07. 24 v 4:40 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a): > > churchyard pypy pypy3.10 pypy3.9 > > > IMHO this uses a valid Callaway expression. > > It has UCD in it, which is not part of fedora-license-data, but it was listed in the old wiki: > > There is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD > > And it is listed in https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Licensing:Main&oldid=651191#Good_Licenses > > --- > > https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/30 > > With last Richard comment from that issue I guess converting to Unicode-3.0 is the right step. Correct? No, I think in context I was only commenting on the package perl-Encode. Sorry, I see that is confusing in the issue comment thread. That issue does give some sense of the problem here, particularly this comment: https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/30#note_1321684964 Still, Miro is correct, `UCD` is a valid Callaway abbreviation for a license that was assumed to be "good" under the Callaway system. On the other hand, any use of Callaway `UCD` is inherently problematic because the Callaway classification doesn't really make any sense under the principles underlying the Callaway system. I believe there is another issue where I hypothesize that `UCD` was classified as "good" because in possibly most cases where it seems to apply, the license is bogus because the purportedly covered material is likely in the public domain. Richard -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
