Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26. 06. 24 5:59, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 7:20 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 25. 06. 24 22:50, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):

Could you make the comment something like this?

   # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
   # TODO check if there are other licenses to be listed
   License: GPL-2.0-only

We (the Change owners) discussed this on a meeting today. And we agreed on output:

    # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
    # TODO convert to correct SPDX identifier
    # See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/
    License:  LicenseRef-Callaway-GPLv2

This is valid SPDX identifier. But not on the list of Fedora's allowed
licenses, so any QA tool will remind you to check the license.

What do you think?

I don't understand what is the benefit of doing this at all. Sorry.

The benefit I see is that it immediately causes all license tags to
conform to the SPDX license expression standard, while also making it
very clear what parts of those license expressions are actually legacy
elements that have to be examined and replaced. (This assumes we
wouldn't use `LicenseRef-Callaway-` for any other purpose.)

What is the benefit of that outcome?

I understand the benefit of SPDX in general.

I don't understand the benefit of converting everything to custom LicenseRef identifiers.

We are already making it clear that the expressions are legacy by... being legacy.

Clearly, I must miss something. What do we *gain* by causing all license tags to conform to the SPDX license expression standard despite actually just using the old tag with extra boilerplate?

I am not trying to fight this decision, I am genuinely confused: What it is that makes us hurry this. Why cannot we keep the gradual conversion?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux