Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:47:55AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 06. 24 5:59, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 7:20 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 25. 06. 24 22:50, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could you make the comment something like this?
> > > > > 
> > > > >    # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
> > > > >    # TODO check if there are other licenses to be listed
> > > > >    License: GPL-2.0-only
> > > > 
> > > > We (the Change owners) discussed this on a meeting today. And we agreed on output:
> > > > 
> > > >     # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
> > > >     # TODO convert to correct SPDX identifier
> > > >     # See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/
> > > >     License:  LicenseRef-Callaway-GPLv2
> > > > 
> > > > This is valid SPDX identifier. But not on the list of Fedora's allowed
> > > > licenses, so any QA tool will remind you to check the license.
> > > > 
> > > > What do you think?
> > > 
> > > I don't understand what is the benefit of doing this at all. Sorry.
> > 
> > The benefit I see is that it immediately causes all license tags to
> > conform to the SPDX license expression standard, while also making it
> > very clear what parts of those license expressions are actually legacy
> > elements that have to be examined and replaced. (This assumes we
> > wouldn't use `LicenseRef-Callaway-` for any other purpose.)
> 
> What is the benefit of that outcome?
> 
> I understand the benefit of SPDX in general.
> 
> I don't understand the benefit of converting everything to custom LicenseRef
> identifiers.

If you have tools which process SPDX expressions, with a full conversion
of outstanding RPMs to LicenseRef, you would now be able to use these
tools on Fedora specfiles (more) reliably.

Fedora could (should) also apply CI tests that enforce a valid SPDX
expression, as there are almost certainly some accidental errors that
have crept in (I know I've made some).

These are small, but still tangible benefits, over having the ill-defined
mixture of SPDX and Callaway expressions live on for more years.

Fully replacing the LicenseRef-Callaway terms within the expressions
would still remain highly desirable, ongoing work.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux