Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25. 06. 24 22:50, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 25. 06. 24 v 1:09 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):

Could you make the comment something like this?

  # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
  # TODO check if there are other licenses to be listed
  License: GPL-2.0-only

We (the Change owners) discussed this on a meeting today. And we agreed on output:

   # Automatically converted from old format: GPLv2
   # TODO convert to correct SPDX identifier
   # See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/
   License:  LicenseRef-Callaway-GPLv2

This is valid SPDX identifier. But not on the list of Fedora's allowed licenses, so any QA tool will remind you to check the license.

What do you think?

I don't understand what is the benefit of doing this at all. Sorry.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux