On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 3:50 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Neither "Functional" nor "eFficient" are in the Fedora Foundations, > but in general, I think we should prefer the former over the latter. > It's better for the project overall to be a little less efficient than > it could be than to surprise people with "a key package no longer > works on your hardware". As I recall from a quick scan of the commits (and I am not going to claim I looked closely), some of the later commits are not build time choices/checks, but now just presume x86_64-v2. Reverting the removals (and maintaining) those commits is likely not a viable option for Fedora packaging. While I would prefer that upstream had added in run time checks (and make their best choices) rather than build time/code checks, I do understand that upstreams are not likely to resource that for use cases that are considered uncommon (x86_64-v1 systems running qemu). -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
