Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 5:47 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:05:13AM -0400, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > This never made it to the packaging guidelines, but FESCo made a relevant
> > decision a few years ago:
> >
> > Libraries packaged in Fedora may require ISA extensions, however any
> > packaged application must not crash on any officially supported
> > architecture, either by providing a generic fallback implementation OR by
> > cleanly exiting when the requisite hardware support is unavailable.
> >
> > https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1044
>
> Wow, that is incredibly *loosely* written. That allows for glibc to
> build itself with '-march=x86-64-v2', or for systemd to build itself
> with '-march=x86_64-v2 -mneeded', at the discretion of the maintainer.
> This would effectively reverse the entire decision to reject the
> x86-64-v2 baseline feature proposal for.
>
> Surely that is not what they meant to permit ? Surely this exception
> was only intended to be scoped more narrowly ? Perhaps to non-critical
> path libraries, or only packages outside the default release media ?

It has been some time since I was part of this discussion (IIRC both
in FPC and FESCo at the time), and yes, I don't think your
interpretation matches our intentions, even though it *could* be read
that way. IIRC this was mostly about adding *new* packages that have
higher ISA requirements than x86_64-v1 (the current Fedora baseline).
I don't think we considered that existing packages might want to push
their requirements, too. But as I said, it's been some time, so I
might mis-remember.

So in the situation with QEMU, IMO it would be best to do detection of
AVX2 (or whatever x86_64-v2 features are required) at *runtime* and
provide a slower fallback code path. Alternatively, patch the build
system to build without the assumption that x86_64-v2 instructions are
available.

Fabio
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux