> On Sat, May 25 2024 at 12:55:05 PM +00:00:00, Byoungchan Lee via devel > <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: >Yes! Thanks for the confirmation, Michael! > No. That's an example of what you no longer need to do now that > noopenh264 is available in Fedora. Previously, dlopen() was required > since you cannot build depend on the real openh264. Now, you can build > depend on noopenh264 instead. I see. To clarify, Chromium and WebRTC use source-embedded OpenH264, which is located in the third_party/openh264 directory. While this is okay for Google, as they likely have a license agreement with other patent holders, Fedora needs to use the Cisco's OpenH264 binary package. >From what I understand, even with noopenh264, Chromium and WebRTC's codebase will still need modification to use Fedora's OpenH264 or noopenh264 package. What do you think? -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
