On Sun, May 26 2024 at 06:09:06 AM +00:00:00, Mattia Verga via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I see you have created noopenh264 just for wrapping openh264, would
it worth to use ffms2 (which wraps more codecs) instead?
The two things we care about are gstreamer1-plugin-openh264 and
mozilla-openh264, neither of which use ffmpeg. It's probably possible
to switch them to use ffmpeg I guess? but that sounds like work. And
ultimately Cisco would have to be willing to host a new H.264-enabled
ffmpeg build for us, otherwise we wouldn't be able to use it in Fedora,
right? That would bring us up to three popular ffmpegs (Fedora's,
hypothetical Cisco, RPM Fusion) which seems a little complicated.
It's probably doable, but sounds like a bunch of work, and what would
be the benefit?
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
