Il 25/05/24 4:36 PM, Michael Catanzaro
ha scritto:
2. I came across jgrulich's pull request for the Chromium package that proposes using dlopen with OpenH264 ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/pull-request/29 ). I also found a WebRTC changelist addressing a similar issue ( https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/349301 ). Are these changes related to noopenh264?No. That's an example of what you no longer need to do now that noopenh264 is available in Fedora. Previously, dlopen() was required since you cannot build depend on the real openh264. Now, you can build depend on noopenh264 instead.
Doesn't ffms2 [1] provides similar functionality for wrapping codecs without depending on ffmpeg directly?
I see you have created noopenh264 just for wrapping openh264, would it worth to use ffms2 (which wraps more codecs) instead?
Mattia
[1] https://github.com/FFMS/ffms2
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
