On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 8:15 AM Byoungchan Lee via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > .... While this is okay > for Google, as they likely have a license agreement with other patent > holders > While I do not think it has ever been officially confirmed, it has been widely conjectured that Google just pays the maximum license fee for H.264 to cover all their Chrome binary downloads, which, while it would be a lot of money for many, is just pocket change for a company with the revenue of a Google (last I recall, the H.264 license fee cap around $10M/yr). -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
