Re: LLVM Packaging Ideas for Fedora 41

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15. 05. 24 13:31, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I am saying that Python is bad example and nobody should follow it.

I respectfully disagree. The LLVM maintainers think it is a good example worth following. So did the NodeJS maintainers. Name-versioning all the components makes things so much easier for the maintainers.

The component name does not matter to the "normal" users. It only matters to experienced packagers, but those should be capable of dealing with that.

(The Python 3 vs Python thing obviously is horrible, and nobody should ever do anything like that again.)

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux