Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13. 05. 24 12:34, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2024, 11:50 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 01:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3


What the heck? This should have been gimp2 for the old version, not
gimp3 for the new version...

Also, how did this pass review?

License:        LGPLv3+

And I'll answer myself: it hasn't or at least I can't find any review
ticket.

Nils, could you explain how this package ended up in Fedora?

Standard procedure, everything seems to be in order:

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/62152

The review exception is valid because it's an alternative version of an
existing package, and Nils is also the maintainer of the existing package.

It that exception automatic ? I thought it had to be explicitly
requested from FPC ? eg in

  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee#Review_Process_Exemption_Procedure

It says:

   "The FPC can grant exceptions to the normal package review process.
    This may happen, for instance, if a large number of similar packages
    are being submitted at once or if a package is being updated to a
    new major version while the old version is being kept in the
    distribution with a different name.
    ..
    Just file a ticket here, set the component to "Review Process Exception"
    and explain (with detail) why you're requesting the exemption and the
    committee will consider it in the next meeting. "

So gimp3 falls under the 2nd example documented there, but still sounds
like an FPC ticket was needed ?

This is documented here:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process

The section of the wiki page you linked should probably be updated/retired.

----


Anyway, if packagers are abusing this exception to import packages which don't even build, perhaps we should revisit if this exception is needed.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux