Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 13, 2024, 12:34 Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 12:14:14PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024, 11:50 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 13 May 2024 at 01:00, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 4:59 PM Sérgio Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gimp3
> > > >
> > >
> > > What the heck? This should have been gimp2 for the old version, not
> > > gimp3 for the new version...
> >
> > Also, how did this pass review?
> >
> > License:        LGPLv3+
> >
> > And I'll answer myself: it hasn't or at least I can't find any review
> > ticket.
> >
> > Nils, could you explain how this package ended up in Fedora?
>
> Standard procedure, everything seems to be in order:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/62152
>
> The review exception is valid because it's an alternative version of an
> existing package, and Nils is also the maintainer of the existing package.

It that exception automatic ? I thought it had to be explicitly
requested from FPC ? eg in

 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee#Review_Process_Exemption_Procedure

It says:

  "The FPC can grant exceptions to the normal package review process.
   This may happen, for instance, if a large number of similar packages
   are being submitted at once or if a package is being updated to a
   new major version while the old version is being kept in the
   distribution with a different name.
   ..
   Just file a ticket here, set the component to "Review Process Exception"
   and explain (with detail) why you're requesting the exemption and the
   committee will consider it in the next meeting. "

So gimp3 falls under the 2nd example documented there, but still sounds
like an FPC ticket was needed ?

The wiki is outdated. All documentation from FPC has been moved to docs.fp.o.

The exceptions are documented here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_process

These cases are treated as "automatically approved" and don't need package review nor FPC approval.

Fabio


With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux