From: "Dave Jones" <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > My http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/*/ pages have a list > of patches in each kernel, though they are somewhat out of date now. Looking at: http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/FC4/kernel-2.6.13-1.1529_FC4.src.rpm-buildlog.txt I see this: + echo 'Patch #1021 (linux-2.6-debug-sleep-in-irq-warning.patch):' + echo 'Patch #1900 (linux-2.6-obsolete-idescsi-warning.patch):' + echo 'Patch #1901 (linux-2.6-obsolete-oss-warning.patch):' + echo 'Patch #801 (linux-2.6-build-userspace-headers-warning.patch):' /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:6:2: warning: #warning using private kernel header; include <endian.h> instead! /usr/lib/bison.simple:164:5: warning: "YYMAXDEPTH" is not defined Patch #1021 (linux-2.6-debug-sleep-in-irq-warning.patch): Patch #1900 (linux-2.6-obsolete-idescsi-warning.patch): Patch #1901 (linux-2.6-obsolete-oss-warning.patch): Patch #801 (linux-2.6-build-userspace-headers-warning.patch): Does this mean that 2.6.13-1.1529 in FC4 has only 4 patches on top of the upstream kernel? > At some point the patches in CVS will all be documented, and > I can run some script nightly that auto-generates those text files. That would be very cool indeed, I was just trying to convince a friend that FC4 kernels are rather standard. It would have come in handy :) -- Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Lattica, Inc. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
