On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 07:53:09PM -0400, Dimi Paun wrote: > From: "Dave Jones" <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> > > My http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/*/ pages have a list > > of patches in each kernel, though they are somewhat out of date now. > > Looking at: > > http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/FC4/kernel-2.6.13-1.1529_FC4.src.rpm-buildlog.txt > > I see this: > + echo 'Patch #1021 (linux-2.6-debug-sleep-in-irq-warning.patch):' > + echo 'Patch #1900 (linux-2.6-obsolete-idescsi-warning.patch):' > + echo 'Patch #1901 (linux-2.6-obsolete-oss-warning.patch):' > + echo 'Patch #801 (linux-2.6-build-userspace-headers-warning.patch):' > /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:6:2: warning: #warning using private kernel > header; include <endian.h> instead! > /usr/lib/bison.simple:164:5: warning: "YYMAXDEPTH" is not defined > Patch #1021 (linux-2.6-debug-sleep-in-irq-warning.patch): > Patch #1900 (linux-2.6-obsolete-idescsi-warning.patch): > Patch #1901 (linux-2.6-obsolete-oss-warning.patch): > Patch #801 (linux-2.6-build-userspace-headers-warning.patch): > > Does this mean that 2.6.13-1.1529 in FC4 has only 4 patches on top of > the upstream kernel? No, that's a side effect of the output of the build log being fed through sort -u before grepping for warnings. Dave -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
