On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 05:11:03AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >The actual patchfiles contain info at the top of the file (or at least a > >pointer to the bugzilla they're fixing) in most cases, though some of the > >'legacy' patches don't have any description yet. > > > It would be useful to add description to those legacy patches too Sure. I'm getting to them one by one, but I've more important things to fix tbh. > and maintain the current status in a URL and kill the Fedora kernels are > heavily patched myth while providing technically capable or merely > curious users more information on the patches. My http://people.redhat.com/davej/kernels/Fedora/*/ pages have a list of patches in each kernel, though they are somewhat out of date now. At some point the patches in CVS will all be documented, and I can run some script nightly that auto-generates those text files. Dave -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
