Hi Jens, Apologies for resurrecting and older thread here On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 02:06:22PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > (Not sure if it makes sense to post to Discourse: Haskell library reviews > are still a little bit "esoteric" since ghc uses some non-standard linking > (ie various warnings appear which tend to discourage/throw less experienced > reviewers alas: perhaps they should be spelled out further as exception(s) > in the Haskell Packaging policy, so I don't need to keep explaining them). > Warnings from fedora-review and rpmlint, or in the build output? If the warnings are from the first two, we should probably try and get them fixed - I will try and look closely the next time I do a Haskell review. Some other ecosystems (e.g. Guile) also trigger a lot of rpmlint warnings, and I have in mind fixing the rpmlint policies so that at some point we can actually make use of the result - right now there's too many false positives. Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind (né Salim) _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
