As a pandoc user, I'm happy to help with any reviews. Is there a list where this tends to get posted, apart from devel? Thanks, Michel On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 11:26:33PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > I should also have added there's an increasing amount of technical debt > with the pandoc packaging - I guess I need to beg people to help with > package reviews: also reminded of our packaging (review) streamlining > discussion from Flock last year. > > Jens > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 23:23 Jens-Ulrik Petersen, <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello I am here - thanks for contacting me. > > > > I was hoping to cover this as part of my F40 Change, but unfortunately I > > haven't gotten to it, so the Change is now at risk of being deferred to F41. > > > > Nevertheless I will see what I can do about this for F40: maybe a backport > > can also be done for F39. > > > > Next time you could also comment on the relevant bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996301 - that would be > > appreciated. > > > > Thanks, Jens > > > > PS Special thanks to Neal Gompa for pinging me in Matrix. 🙏 > > > > > > On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 20:05 Christopher Klooz, <py0xc3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> I cannot reach the maintainer petersen (see mail below): The package > >> "pandoc" remains at 3.1.3 in Fedora, but pandoc is already at 3.1.11.1. > >> Among the updates since 3.1.3, there have been two security-critical > >> (including the medium CVE-2023-35936. Security fixes are in 3.1.4 & 3.1.6). > >> > >> The actual risk is limited, but these should be updated nevertheless. > >> > >> Does anyone know how to reach him by other means? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- > >> Subject: Fedora package "pandoc" outdated and contains security > >> vulnerability > >> Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 15:55:09 +0100 > >> From: py0xc3@xxxxxxxxxx > >> To: petersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> > >> Hi petersen, > >> > >> I am reaching out because of the package "pandoc", which you maintain. > >> > >> I have seen that the package is still at version 3.1.3 [1] when I tried > >> to install it with dnf, whereas the current version is 3.1.11.1 [2]: is > >> this intended or an accident? > >> > >> It has to be noted that the updates that have been added in the meantime > >> contain fixes for security vulnerabilities (at least CVE-2023-35936; I have > >> just roughly skimmed the changelogs). So at the moment, it seems the Fedora > >> build can be exploited by attackers in some circumstances [3] [4] because > >> it is still at 3.1.3. > >> > >> Regards & thanks for maintaining, > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11560 > >> > >> [2] https://hackage.haskell.org/package/pandoc & > >> https://github.com/jgm/pandoc > >> > >> [3] https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases?page=1 > >> > >> [4] https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases?page=2 > >> > >> -- > >> _______________________________________________ > >> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: > >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >> List Archives: > >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Do not reply to spam, report it: > >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > >> > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Michel Lind (né Salim) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
