As a pandoc user, I'm happy to help with any reviews. Is there a list where this tends to get posted, apart from devel? Thanks, Michel
Once the package needs a review, the request should be found
here: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/
Details of the roles of "contributor" and "reviewer" in the "package review process" can be found here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Review_Process/ (based upon its history, I expect this page is kept updated but I don't know for sure)
According to the elaboration, you need to be in the FAS packager group, even for reviews.
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 11:26:33PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:I should also have added there's an increasing amount of technical debt with the pandoc packaging - I guess I need to beg people to help with package reviews: also reminded of our packaging (review) streamlining discussion from Flock last year. Jens On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 23:23 Jens-Ulrik Petersen, <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hello I am here - thanks for contacting me. I was hoping to cover this as part of my F40 Change, but unfortunately I haven't gotten to it, so the Change is now at risk of being deferred to F41. Nevertheless I will see what I can do about this for F40: maybe a backport can also be done for F39. Next time you could also comment on the relevant bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996301 - that would be appreciated. Thanks, Jens PS Special thanks to Neal Gompa for pinging me in Matrix. 🙏 On Fri, 9 Feb 2024, 20:05 Christopher Klooz, <py0xc3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I cannot reach the maintainer petersen (see mail below): The package "pandoc" remains at 3.1.3 in Fedora, but pandoc is already at 3.1.11.1. Among the updates since 3.1.3, there have been two security-critical (including the medium CVE-2023-35936. Security fixes are in 3.1.4 & 3.1.6). The actual risk is limited, but these should be updated nevertheless. Does anyone know how to reach him by other means? Regards, Chris -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Fedora package "pandoc" outdated and contains security vulnerability Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 15:55:09 +0100 From: py0xc3@xxxxxxxxxx To: petersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hi petersen, I am reaching out because of the package "pandoc", which you maintain. I have seen that the package is still at version 3.1.3 [1] when I tried to install it with dnf, whereas the current version is 3.1.11.1 [2]: is this intended or an accident? It has to be noted that the updates that have been added in the meantime contain fixes for security vulnerabilities (at least CVE-2023-35936; I have just roughly skimmed the changelogs). So at the moment, it seems the Fedora build can be exploited by attackers in some circumstances [3] [4] because it is still at 3.1.3. Regards & thanks for maintaining, Chris [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11560 [2] https://hackage.haskell.org/package/pandoc & https://github.com/jgm/pandoc [3] https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases?page=1 [4] https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/releases?page=2 -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
