On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 11:17 AM Michel Lind <salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 07:53:38PM +0000, Christopher Klooz wrote:
> On 14/02/2024 17.35, Michel Lind wrote:
> > As a pandoc user, I'm happy to help with any reviews. Is there a list
> > where this tends to get posted, apart from devel?
Thanks Michel for taking the base64 review.
I realised a second open package review is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068718 (isocline)
- it's a newer dep for pandoc (actually hslua-repl).
Was just wondering if there's another place where Haskell packaging is coordinated.
It is a good question...
I was trying to do that previously in the Haskell SIG (mailing list and channel), but the traction became so low that I largely gave up with that... other than occasionally begging someone specifically to help with an urgent review. ;-(
I can certainly send out such mails there and/or here going forward for more direct awareness.
(Not sure if it makes sense to post to Discourse: Haskell library reviews are still a little bit "esoteric" since ghc uses some non-standard linking (ie various warnings appear which tend to discourage/throw less experienced reviewers alas: perhaps they should be spelled out further as exception(s) in the Haskell Packaging policy, so I don't need to keep explaining them).
I will be posting more reviews soon: in particular a large bunch of hslua related packages - though I think it is better to roll them out in reverse dependency order.
Jens
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
