Re: just to let you know FESCo agreed to a preliminary injunction while we consider this issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steve Cossette wrote:
> But I feel like I'm going off subject. I also think you are right, the KDE
> COPR-solution would work as long as it is documented somewhere. We could
> simply put it in the Fedora docs page, but also clearly note that those
> packages are not supported, but will be updated until the underlying
> frameworks (e.g. Xorg, or when the KDE foundation no longer supports Xorg,
> whichever comes first) are no longer available.

Unlike you ("you" = the KDE SIG), I actually believe I can probably keep my 
*-x11 packages on life support for some time even if and when KDE upstream 
drops their X11 support. Kinda like I have been doing for, e.g., Blogilo. 
Realistic would be until the release of Plasma 7, unless some Plasma 6.x 
introduces major changes that make it impractical. But I hope this is not 
going to be a concern for Fedora 40.

        Kevin Kofler
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux