Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 7:54 AM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 25 2023 at 09:15:37 PM -0400, Neal Gompa
> <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > There was no switching. Both appstream-util and appstreamcli are
> > considered conformant.
> >
> > Ultimately, the only way we can stop relying on appstream-glib is if
> > appstream-builder[1] was reimplemented on top of libappstream-compose.
> >
> > Long ago, I tried to see if we could have our AppStream data produced
> > as repodata instead of a package, but the answer I got was that we
> > need the functionality added to createrepo to do it[2]. If someone
> > ever got around to making that happen, a lot of things in our pipeline
> > could be simplified.
> >
> > [1]:
> > https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/tree/main/libappstream-builder
> > [2]: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/createrepo_c/issues/75
>
> Hi,
>
> Matthias Klumpp has suggested using a tool called appstream-generator:
>
> https://github.com/ximion/appstream/issues/476#issuecomment-1776286096
>
> It's pretty clear the two tools have incompatible ideas of what
> metadata is valid, and the apptsream-glib repo has a big warning that
> you shouldn't actually use it, so upstreams will continue to migrate
> from appstream-util to appstreamcli regardless of what Fedora does.
> We'll probably encounter more problems as time goes on.
>

I know appstream-generator (I'm the maintainer of it in Fedora). The
RPM backend is not equivalent to the one we have for
appstream-builder. It may or may not need work for us to use it.

The two tools don't have incompatible ideas of valid metadata, we
intentionally don't do strict validation.




--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux