Il 24/09/23 01:18, Neal Gompa ha scritto: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 6:05 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 23 2023 at 10:26:48 PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos >> <alex.ploumistos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Could someone involved >>> with AppStream please provide some information? Shouldn't our >>> documentation be changed to reflect these changes? Does the FPC need >>> to decide on this? >> From upstream perspective: appstream-util is indeed obsolete. Upstream >> software should stop using it and switch to appstreamcli instead. >> >> But as you've noticed, it seems Fedora isn't ready for that yet.... > Ultimately, appstream-util's output is what matters since we use > appstream-builder (from appstream-glib) to generate our AppStream > metadata index. If it doesn't pass that tool, it doesn't show up. > If upstream switched to appstreamcli, what tool do they use to generate the index to not fail validation? Can Fedora switch to that other tool? Mattia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
