Re: Packaging guidelines - validation of AppStream metadata files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




24. syyskuuta 2023 2.18.14 GMT+03:00 Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> kirjoitti:

>> On Sat, Sep 23 2023 at 10:26:48 PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos
>> <alex.ploumistos@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Could someone involved
>> > with AppStream please provide some information? Shouldn't our
>> > documentation be changed to reflect these changes? Does the FPC need
>> > to decide on this?
>
>Ultimately, appstream-util's output is what matters since we use
>appstream-builder (from appstream-glib) to generate our AppStream
>metadata index. If it doesn't pass that tool, it doesn't show up.

Since this is not the first time this suggestion has been made, perhaps it would make sense to document the reason in Packaging Guidelines?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux