On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 01:03:08PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Wed, 27 Sept 2023 at 22:41, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm not sure at all that it would be possible to do at compose-time... > > composes are taking around 3.5-4hours and thats after I have done > > a lot to speed them up, but might be worth some benchmarking > > to see how much slower it would be. If we are going to go that route, we > > should see if support could be added to pungi. > > On server class hardware with fast disk access it's an additional 10 > minutes or so. > > > Moving this from a package to in repodata would grow the repodata quite > > a lot right? > > 6.9M fedora-39-icons.tar.gz > 6.3M fedora-39.xml.gz So, on re-reading this thread and the upstream issues... it really seems like the best case would be createrepo_c just adding support, but that seems stalled/blocked due to i/o concerns? (which I can understand, but it could be default off?) How does the local/rpm data interact with the repodata (if it exists)? Or does it depend on the tool? I suppose in the short term at least if you wanted you could hand off the generation/rpm updating to releng? (Not that releng wants more to do, but I don't think you should carry this by yourself). kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
