Re: Adding Passim as a Fedora 40 feature?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



V Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 07:34:35PM +0100, Richard Hughes napsal(a):
> you need to reboot into the new firmware before the published firmware gets
> shared;

Won't this suppress an effeciency of the local sharing? If a typical period
between a download and the reboot is significantly longer than a period in
which machines check for and download the firmaware, it will happen that all
machines will sepearately download the firmware from a central server instead
of downloading it from local peers. Because all the machines will be waiting
on the reboot.

> on the logic that you don't want to advertise to the world that you're
> currently running insecure firmware.
> 
For how long is the firmware adveritised? As long as it is advertised, people
know what version you are currently running. This information becomes
interesting when a new firmware is released. Then you have exactly the same
problem you want to address.

-- Petr

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux