Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 7/17/23 07:39, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> 
> Hi, I put more details in the fesco ticket: 
> https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3039#comment-864686 I believe these are 
> commonly known so I did not open any ticket against dnf5.
> 
> As said in the comment, I stopped putting effort into making dnf5 work 
> for our use case (which is provisioning of multiple distributions for 
> upstream PR CI via ansible), we would certainly hit more issues - or 
> unimplemented functionality if you want to sugar coat it - that would 
> require workarounds.

I have a great news dnf5-5.1.0-1.fc39 is in stable. The version 5.1 is the first version with stable API.

Best regards

Jarda
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux