> On 7/17/23 07:39, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > Hi, I put more details in the fesco ticket: > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3039#comment-864686 I believe these are > commonly known so I did not open any ticket against dnf5. > > As said in the comment, I stopped putting effort into making dnf5 work > for our use case (which is provisioning of multiple distributions for > upstream PR CI via ansible), we would certainly hit more issues - or > unimplemented functionality if you want to sugar coat it - that would > require workarounds. I have a great news dnf5-5.1.0-1.fc39 is in stable. The version 5.1 is the first version with stable API. Best regards Jarda _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue